Evaluation of physical activity programmes for elderly people - a descriptive study using the EFQM' criteria
2011

Evaluating Physical Activity Programs for Elderly People

Sample size: 26 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Ana I Marques, Maria J Rosa, Pedro Soares, Rute Santos, Jorge Mota, Joana Carvalho

Primary Institution: Research Centre in Physical Activity, Health and Leisure - Faculty of Sports, Porto University, Portugal

Hypothesis

The study aims to characterize the quality management models of physical activity programs developed by Portuguese Local Administration for elderly people using the EFQM Excellence Model.

Conclusion

The study found that while there are some good practices in physical activity programs for the elderly, significant areas still require improvement.

Supporting Evidence

  • Processes, Leadership, Customer results, and People had high percentage occurrences of quality practices.
  • Partnerships and resources, People results, Policy and strategy, Key performance results, and Society results had lower percentage occurrences.
  • Continuous quality improvement is critical for elderly satisfaction and adherence to physical activity programs.

Takeaway

This study looked at how well physical activity programs for older people are run and found that some things are done well, but there are still many areas that need to get better.

Methodology

The study used a combination of questionnaire surveys, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis to evaluate 26 physical activity programs.

Potential Biases

Self-reporting by coordinators may have led to more favorable outcomes than reality.

Limitations

The study relied on the perceptions of program coordinators, which may not provide a complete picture, and it was cross-sectional rather than longitudinal.

Participant Demographics

The study focused on physical activity programs for elderly people, with participants primarily from Portuguese municipalities.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2458-11-123

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication