Renoprotective effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on acute kidney injury induced by repeated tourniquet application in patients undergoing extremity surgery
2024

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning and Kidney Protection in Surgery

Sample size: 60 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Tao Ziying, Zhang Yang, Kong Erliang, Wei Haili, Li Mingyue, Sun Shuhui, Liu Liwei, Yin Daqing, Feng Xudong

Primary Institution: The 988th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of Chinese People’s Liberation Army, Zhengzhou, China

Hypothesis

This study aimed to investigate the renoprotective effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in patients undergoing extremity surgery with repeated tourniquet application.

Conclusion

RIPC effectively mitigated acute kidney injury caused by repeated tourniquet application, offering a robust method for perioperative renal protection in patients undergoing extremity surgery.

Supporting Evidence

  • The RIPC group showed a significant decrease in BUN and SCr at 48 hours postoperatively.
  • Levels of Cys-C, [TIMP-2] × [IGFBP-7], KIM-1, IL-18, and NGAL were significantly reduced in the RIPC group.
  • MDA levels were significantly lower and SOD levels were significantly higher in the RIPC group compared to the control group.

Takeaway

Using a special technique called remote ischemic preconditioning before surgery can help protect the kidneys from damage caused by tourniquets.

Methodology

This was a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial with 64 patients divided into RIPC and control groups, measuring various renal and oxidative stress biomarkers.

Potential Biases

The potential impact of anesthetic drugs on outcomes was not considered.

Limitations

The study was conducted as a single-center study with a limited sample size, which may affect the generalizability of the results.

Participant Demographics

60 patients, comprising 48 males and 12 females, aged 20-50 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3389/fmed.2024.1477099

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication