Parental Perspectives on Pediatric Surgical Recovery: Narrative Analysis of Free-Text Comments From a Postoperative Survey
2024

Parental Perspectives on Pediatric Surgical Recovery

Sample size: 500 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Rohatgi Nidhi, Baskovic Marko, Elbattah Mahmoud, Luo Jessica, West Nicholas C, Pang Samantha, Robillard Julie M, Page Patricia, Chadha Neil K, Gan Heng, Correll Lynnie R, Ridgway Randa, Broemling Natasha, Görges Matthias

Primary Institution: BC Children’s Hospital

Hypothesis

This study aimed to understand families’ perspectives regarding their children’s surgical recovery using qualitative patient experience data.

Conclusion

Collecting parental recovery feedback is feasible and valued by families, highlighting the need for improved communication strategies between health care providers and parents.

Supporting Evidence

  • 91% of enrolled families completed at least 1 postoperative survey.
  • 53% of families provided at least 1 free-text comment.
  • 82% of comments were largely positive regarding recovery and clinical care experience.
  • Key themes for improvement included communication, length of stay, and recovery experience.

Takeaway

Parents shared their thoughts on how their kids did after surgery, and many had good things to say, but they also wanted better communication from doctors and nurses.

Methodology

Parents or guardians of children aged 0-18 years who underwent surgery at a pediatric tertiary care facility provided feedback through web-based surveys, including free-text comments.

Potential Biases

Participants were recruited from a single institution, which may limit the generalizability of the results.

Limitations

The study was a secondary analysis and responses from patients aged 13-18 years were missed during early postoperative days due to design constraints.

Participant Demographics

Of the 242 included participants, 76% were mothers, 22% were fathers, and 1% were guardians; the median age of patients was 7 years, with a bimodal age distribution.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.2196/65198

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication