Survey on Testicular Microlithiasis Follow-Up Practices
Author Information
Author(s): Ravichandran Subramanian, Smith Richard, Cornford Philip A, Fordham Mark VP
Primary Institution: University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
Hypothesis
What are the current attitudes of urologists in the UK towards the investigation and surveillance of patients with testicular microlithiasis?
Conclusion
There is significant variability in how patients with testicular microlithiasis are followed-up, with many urologists believing that surveillance does not confer a survival benefit.
Supporting Evidence
- 57% of the questionnaires sent were returned, with 251 being analyzed.
- 69% of respondents follow-up patients with testicular microlithiasis.
- 88% of those who follow-up do so annually.
Takeaway
Doctors in the UK have different ways of checking on patients with tiny stones in their testicles, and many think it doesn't help them live longer.
Methodology
A national questionnaire survey was conducted among consultant members of the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS).
Potential Biases
There is a potential bias as the survey may have attracted responses from urologists who are more actively involved in following up microlithiasis.
Limitations
The response rate to the questionnaire was moderate at 57%, which may introduce bias.
Participant Demographics
Consultant urologists from the UK and Ireland.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website