Relationship between a Radiographic Grading Scale of Degenerative Lumbar Disease and Quality of Life
2024

Radiographic Grading of Lumbar Degenerative Disease and Quality of Life

Sample size: 63 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Lira Réjelos Charles Aguiar, Pratali Raphael de Rezende, Daher Murilo Tavares, Pokorny Gabriel Henrique, Amaral Rodrigo Augusto do, Herrero Carlos Fernando Pereira da Silva

Primary Institution: Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo

Hypothesis

To evaluate the correlation between a radiographic scale of lumbar degenerative disease and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

Conclusion

The lumbar degenerative disease grading scale showed a significant relationship with quality of life measured by the ODI score in part of the groups evaluated.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study found a significant relationship between LDD grade 2 and worse ODI scores.
  • Patients with LDD grade 2 had a statistically significant impact on quality of life compared to those without LDD.
  • The grading scale demonstrated good reproducibility in previous studies.
  • Age was found to correlate with the presence of LDD.

Takeaway

This study looked at how a grading system for back problems relates to people's quality of life. It found that certain grades of back issues can make life harder for people.

Methodology

A cross-sectional study comparing the ODI quality of life questionnaire with radiographic parameters for grading lumbar degenerative disease.

Potential Biases

The study did not evaluate interobserver reproducibility of the classification used.

Limitations

The study had a small sample size and the radiographic parameters were analyzed by only one evaluator.

Participant Demographics

Most participants were women (66%) and the majority were classified as grades 0 (28%) or 1 (40%).

Statistical Information

P-Value

p=0.01

Confidence Interval

95% confidence interval for LDD 2: 9.2–25

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1055/s-00042410

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication