The appropriate use of radiography in clinical practice: a report of two cases of biomechanical versus malignant spine pain
2006

Use of Radiography in Spine Pain Cases

Sample size: 2 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Roger Pringle, Lawrence H Wyatt

Primary Institution: Kelsey-Seybold Medical Group, Houston, Texas, USA

Hypothesis

The study aims to evaluate the appropriate use of radiography in patients with spine pain suspected to be non-organic but later found to have malignancy.

Conclusion

The initial decision to forgo radiography did not negatively impact the long-term management of the patients, who were later diagnosed with malignancies.

Supporting Evidence

  • Both patients initially presented with symptoms thought to be non-organic.
  • Malignancies were discovered through advanced imaging after conservative treatment failed.
  • Initial radiographs were normal, indicating the need for further investigation.

Takeaway

Two patients thought to have regular back pain actually had cancer, showing that sometimes doctors don't need to take X-rays right away.

Methodology

Retrospective review of two patients' clinical courses and imaging studies.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in the initial clinical assessment leading to delayed imaging.

Limitations

Both patients were deceased, preventing informed consent for publication.

Participant Demographics

One 54-year-old African American female and one 55-year-old Caucasian male.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1746-1340-14-8

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication