Assessment of glove integrity across various dental specialties in a dental school setting
2024

Assessing Glove Integrity in Dental Procedures

Sample size: 177 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Alsaegh Mohammed Amjed, AlSiraj Mohammed Farooq, Alsadoon Ahmed Naji, Soufi Omar, Mahmoud Okba, Varma Sudhir Rama

Primary Institution: Ajman University

Hypothesis

The study aimed to evaluate the integrity of non-sterile, powder-free latex gloves used by dental students in various dental specialties.

Conclusion

The study found a high rate of glove perforations during dental procedures by undergraduate students, especially in the right thumb and index finger.

Supporting Evidence

  • Perforations were identified in 72 cases (40.7%) of gloves.
  • The most common locations for perforations were the right thumb and right index finger.
  • There were no statistically significant differences in glove integrity loss among different dental specialty procedures.
  • Participants with left-hand dominance exhibited a significantly higher perforation rate compared to those with right-hand dominance.
  • The anticipation of glove integrity matched the actual integrity in 100 cases (62.9%).

Takeaway

Dental students often have holes in their gloves while working, especially on their thumbs and index fingers, which can spread germs.

Methodology

This cross-sectional study involved dental students from Ajman University who provided gloves during various dental specialty procedures, with glove integrity assessed using a modified water leak test.

Potential Biases

The study only examined gloves used by dental undergraduate students without comparing them to those used by licensed and specialist dentists.

Limitations

The study was conducted at a single dental hospital and only evaluated latex examination gloves from one company.

Participant Demographics

The participants included 94 males (59.1%) and 65 females (40.9%) who were fourth and fifth-year dental students.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3389/froh.2024.1496918

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication