Implementation of a workplace smoking ban in bars: The limits of local discretion
2008

Workplace Smoking Ban in Bars: Challenges and Compliance

Sample size: 57 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Montini Theresa, Bero Lisa A

Primary Institution: New York University

Hypothesis

What conditions facilitate or hinder compliance with a smoking ban in bars?

Conclusion

The study suggests that smoking bans in bars are best implemented at a broader provincial or national level due to local political complexities.

Supporting Evidence

  • Bar owners were more likely to comply if the cost of compliance was minimal.
  • Compliance was hindered if competing bars allowed smoking.
  • Local enforcement was often delayed or inadequate.

Takeaway

This study looked at how bars followed a smoking ban and found that if other bars were not following the rules, it was hard for them to do so too.

Methodology

Interviews were conducted with bar employers, local government officials, and tobacco control activists to analyze compliance with the smoking ban.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to self-selection of interview participants who may have been more compliant or engaged with the smoking ban.

Limitations

The study may not fully capture the perspectives of bar owners who did not respond to interview requests.

Participant Demographics

Bar owners from various counties in California, local enforcement officials, and tobacco control activists.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.045

Statistical Significance

p = 0.045

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2458-8-402

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication