Assessing an organizational culture instrument based on the Competing Values Framework: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses
2007

Assessing Organizational Culture in Healthcare

Sample size: 71776 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Helfrich Christian D, Li Yu-Fang, Mohr David C, Meterko Mark, Sales Anne E

Primary Institution: Northwest HSR&D Center of Excellence, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System

Hypothesis

Is the Competing Values Framework (CVF) instrument reliable and valid for non-supervisory employees in healthcare organizations?

Conclusion

The study suggests that the CVF subscales may not be applicable to non-supervisors, indicating a need for further validation of organizational culture instruments.

Supporting Evidence

  • Data from 71,776 non-supervisory employees were analyzed.
  • Internal consistency of the subscales was moderate to strong (α = 0.68 to 0.85).
  • Exploratory factor analysis revealed two factors instead of the expected four.

Takeaway

This study looked at how employees in healthcare feel about their workplace culture. It found that the usual ways of measuring this culture might not work well for all employees.

Methodology

Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on survey data from non-supervisory employees in the Veterans Health Administration.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the reliance on self-reported survey data and the exclusion of supervisory perspectives.

Limitations

The study's findings may not generalize beyond the Veterans Health Administration or to supervisory roles.

Participant Demographics

Participants were non-supervisory employees from 168 VHA facilities, with a response rate of approximately 51%.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1748-5908-2-13

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication