Detection of psychosis by mental health care services; a naturalistic cohort study
2008

Detecting Psychosis in Mental Health Services

Sample size: 6477 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Nynke Boonstra, Lex Wunderink, Sjoerd Sytema, Durk Wiersma

Primary Institution: GGZ Friesland, Research Department, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands

Hypothesis

To what extent are reported psychotic symptoms accounted for in clinical diagnosis?

Conclusion

Many patients with psychotic symptoms are misdiagnosed or not diagnosed at all, indicating that psychosis may be underdetected.

Supporting Evidence

  • 3.7% of patients had specific psychotic symptoms recorded.
  • 37% of patients with reported symptoms were diagnosed with a non-affective psychotic disorder.
  • 90% of patients diagnosed with a non-affective psychotic disorder received antipsychotic prescriptions.

Takeaway

When people go to mental health services and say they have symptoms of psychosis, many of them are not diagnosed correctly, which means they might not get the help they need.

Methodology

The study screened medical files of patients who had first contact with mental health services for reported psychotic symptoms and their clinical diagnosis.

Potential Biases

The reliance on reported symptoms may lead to underdetection of psychotic disorders.

Limitations

The study could not verify clinical diagnoses with standardized procedures, and some symptoms may not have been recorded.

Participant Demographics

Patients aged 18-45, with 51.9% being males.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1745-0179-4-29

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication