Evaluating Reports of Intimate Partner Violence
Author Information
Author(s): Marta Capinha, Daniel Rijo, Marlene Matos, Marco Pereira
Primary Institution: University of Coimbra, Portugal
Hypothesis
This study assesses interpartner agreement on IPV reports based on the Revised Conflict Tactic Scales in a court-related setting.
Conclusion
The study found that interpartner agreement on IPV occurrence was generally higher than on frequency, highlighting the importance of collecting both partners' reports in court-related settings.
Supporting Evidence
- Interpartner agreement on IPV occurrence was found to be higher than on frequency.
- The study highlights the need for both partners' reports in court-related IPV assessments.
- Findings suggest that more prevalent IPV behaviors lead to higher agreement levels.
- Reliability of the CTS-2 in forensic settings was supported by the study's findings.
Takeaway
When couples report on violence in their relationship, they often agree more on whether it happened than on how often it happened.
Methodology
The study used the Revised Conflict Tactic Scales to assess interpartner agreement on IPV reports among 62 different-sex couples in a forensic setting.
Potential Biases
Participants may underreport or overreport IPV due to fear of legal consequences or societal attitudes.
Limitations
The study only included couples who remained together after judicial intervention, potentially excluding more severe cases of IPV.
Participant Demographics
Couples were aged between 21 and 81 years, mostly married, with a majority living in rural areas and having between 5 to 10 years of education.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.05
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website