Cost-effectiveness of C-reactive protein point of care testing for safely reducing antibiotic consumption for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as part of the multicentre, parallel-arm, open, individually randomised, controlled PACE trial
2024

Cost-effectiveness of C-reactive protein testing to reduce antibiotic use in COPD

Sample size: 649 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Sewell Bernadette, Francis Nick, Harris Shaun, Gillespie David, Bates Janine, White Patrick, Alam Mohammed Fasihul, Hood Kerenza, Butler Christopher C, Fitzsimmons Deborah

Primary Institution: Swansea University

Hypothesis

Is C-reactive protein point-of-care testing cost-effective for reducing antibiotic consumption in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

Conclusion

C-reactive protein point-of-care testing is a cost-effective intervention for safely reducing antibiotic consumption in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Supporting Evidence

  • CRP-POCT led to a 20% absolute reduction in antibiotic consumption.
  • The mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £120 per 1% reduction in antibiotic consumption.
  • There is a 73% probability of CRP-POCT being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 per QALY gained.
  • Both groups had similar clinical outcomes, indicating non-inferiority in health status.

Takeaway

Doctors can use a simple test to see if patients with breathing problems need antibiotics, which helps avoid giving them when they don't need it.

Methodology

A multicentre, parallel-arm, open, individually randomised controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of C-reactive protein point-of-care testing in primary care.

Potential Biases

The study may have biases related to the perspective taken and the short follow-up period.

Limitations

The study was limited by its UK National Health Service perspective, which does not account for wider societal costs, and the short-term follow-up that may not capture long-term outcomes.

Participant Demographics

Participants were adults presenting with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.031

Confidence Interval

95% CI −£116.49 to £130.11

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084144

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication