Lung Cancer Research in Postwar Britain
Author Information
Author(s): Carsten Timmermann
Primary Institution: University of Manchester
Hypothesis
Did the stigma associated with smoking affect the research focus on lung cancer in Britain during the 1950s and 1960s?
Conclusion
The study found that the perceived neglect of lung cancer research was not due to stigma but rather to the challenges in developing effective treatments.
Supporting Evidence
- The British Medical Research Council organized clinical trials for lung cancer in the 1950s and 1960s.
- Despite significant research efforts, the results of lung cancer treatments were disappointing.
- The stigma associated with smoking did not significantly hinder lung cancer research in the postwar period.
Takeaway
Researchers thought lung cancer was important to study, but they faced many challenges in finding effective treatments, which made it seem like no one cared about it.
Methodology
The study analyzed clinical trials organized by the British Medical Research Council from the 1950s to the 1970s.
Potential Biases
There was a risk of bias due to the perception that lung cancer was a self-inflicted disease, which may have influenced treatment decisions.
Limitations
The trials faced ethical issues and difficulties in patient recruitment, which may have affected the outcomes.
Participant Demographics
The typical lung cancer patient in the 1950s was usually a middle-aged man.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website