Treatment in Borderline Class III Malocclusion: Orthodontic Camouflage (Extraction) Versus Orthognathic Surgery
2008

Treatment Options for Class III Malocclusion

Sample size: 25 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Rabie A-Bakr M., Wong Ricky W.K., Min G.U.

Primary Institution: The University of Hong Kong

Hypothesis

What are the differences in treatment outcomes between camouflage orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery for borderline class III malocclusion patients?

Conclusion

Both camouflage orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery can lead to satisfactory improvements in borderline class III malocclusion patients.

Supporting Evidence

  • 72% of patients were correctly classified based on the Holdaway angle.
  • Significant differences were found in several cephalometric measurements between treatment groups.
  • Both treatment modalities can achieve satisfactory profile improvements.

Takeaway

Doctors can help people with a specific jaw problem by either moving teeth or doing surgery, and both ways can make smiles better.

Methodology

Cephalometric analysis of 25 patients (13 orthodontic, 12 surgical) with class III malocclusion.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in treatment selection based on clinician preference.

Limitations

The study is retrospective and may not account for all variables influencing treatment decisions.

Participant Demographics

Patients included were southern Chinese with borderline class III malocclusion.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.2174/187421060080201003819088881

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication