Prognostic immune markers in esophageal cancer patients managed with trimodal therapy
2024

Prognostic Immune Markers in Esophageal Cancer Patients

Sample size: 25 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Farrugia Mark K., Repasky Elizabeth A., Chen Minhui, Attwood Kristopher, Catalfamo Kayla, Rosenheck Hanna, Yao Song, Mattson David M., Mukherjee Sarbajit, Kukar Moshim, Witkiewicz Agnieszka K., Singh Anurag K.

Primary Institution: Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center

Hypothesis

Is the immune landscape of pretreatment tissue associated with relapse in esophageal cancer patients managed with trimodal therapy?

Conclusion

High expression of certain immune markers in pretreatment biopsy samples is associated with reduced rates of relapse in esophageal cancer patients.

Supporting Evidence

  • Higher expression of HLA-DR, CD8/LAG3, and CD8/CTLA4 was associated with longer time to progression.
  • Stromal expression of CD163 and CD163/PDL1 was linked to improved disease-specific survival.
  • 48% of patients experienced relapse within the follow-up period.

Takeaway

Doctors looked at tissue samples from patients with esophageal cancer to see if certain immune markers could help predict if they would get worse after treatment. They found that some markers were linked to better outcomes.

Methodology

The study analyzed pretreatment biopsies from 25 esophageal cancer patients using high-throughput multispectral immunofluorescence to assess immune marker expression.

Potential Biases

Referral patterns may have introduced selection bias, as most patients were biopsied before evaluation at the institution.

Limitations

The small sample size limited the ability to adjust for confounding variables, and the study could not differentiate between stromal and tumoral expression of some markers.

Participant Demographics

The median age was 68 years, with 92% male and 84% having adenocarcinoma.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p=0.0069 for HLA-DR and p=0.036 for CD8/CTLA4

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1007/s00262-024-03891-3

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication