Guidelines for Perinatal and Child Health Care in Crisis Settings
Author Information
Author(s): Turner Tari J, Barnes Hayley, Reid Jane, Garrubba Marie
Primary Institution: Monash Institute of Health Services Research, Monash University
Hypothesis
Are existing guidelines for perinatal and child health care in crisis settings based on research evidence?
Conclusion
No evidence-based guidelines for perinatal and child health care in disaster settings were identified, but many Cochrane reviews could support future guidelines.
Supporting Evidence
- Six guidelines met selection criteria, but none were based on research evidence.
- 198 Cochrane reviews were potentially relevant, mostly addressing nutrient supplementation and maternal health.
- Only 18 (9.1%) reviews have summaries in Evidence Aid.
Takeaway
The study looked for rules to help take care of babies and moms during emergencies but found that there aren't any good rules based on research. However, there are many studies that could help make better rules in the future.
Methodology
Broad internet searches were conducted to identify relevant guidelines, which were then appraised using AGREE criteria, and Cochrane reviews were searched for relevance.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to the limited scope of guidelines reviewed and the reliance on available research evidence.
Limitations
The study focused only on guidelines available in English and in the field of perinatal and child health, which may not represent other areas of emergency health care.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website