Prognostic Role of Neutrophil Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio in Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
2024

Neutrophil Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio as a Predictor in NSTEMI Patients

Sample size: 464 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Karaca Mehmet, Gumusdag Ayca, Andò Giuseppe

Primary Institution: Dr. Siyami Ersek Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Education Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences Turkey

Hypothesis

This study aimed to investigate whether neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR) levels on admission have prognostic significance regarding one-year major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients.

Conclusion

The NPAR can be used as a newly identified promising inflammatory biomarker to predict one-year MACCEs in NSTEMI patients undergoing revascularization therapy.

Supporting Evidence

  • Patients with MACCEs had higher CRP and neutrophil levels and lower albumin levels.
  • NPAR showed better predictive performance than other inflammatory markers.
  • Individuals with an NPAR value greater than 17.6 were at greater risk of developing MACCEs.

Takeaway

Doctors can use a simple blood test that looks at neutrophils and albumin to help predict if heart attack patients will have problems in the next year.

Methodology

This was a retrospective study that reviewed medical records of NSTEMI patients, measuring various blood parameters and calculating NPAR, CAR, and SII index to evaluate their association with MACCEs over a 12-month follow-up.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from the retrospective nature of the study and reliance on medical records.

Limitations

The study's retrospective design and small sample size may limit the generalizability of the findings.

Participant Demographics

The cohort consisted of 464 patients with a mean age of 59.2 years, including various cardiovascular risk factors.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/medicina60122101

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication