Injury mortality in rural South Africa 2000 – 2007: rates and associated factors
2011

Injury Mortality in Rural South Africa: Rates and Associated Factors

Sample size: 133483 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Garrib Anupam, Herbst Abraham J, Hosegood Victoria, Newell Marie-Louise

Primary Institution: Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal

Hypothesis

To estimate injury mortality rates in a rural population in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa and to identify socio-demographic risk factors associated with adult injury-related deaths.

Conclusion

Reducing the high levels of injury-related mortality in South Africa requires intersectoral primary prevention efforts that address the root causes of violent and accidental deaths.

Supporting Evidence

  • 8.9% of deaths were due to injury-related causes.
  • Homicide, road traffic injuries, and suicide were the major causes of injury deaths.
  • The estimated crude injury mortality rate was 142.4 per 100,000 person-years.
  • Full-time employment was associated with lower mortality rates.
  • Men with higher asset ownership had increased mortality rates.

Takeaway

Injuries are a big problem in South Africa, especially for young men, and many deaths are caused by violence and accidents. We need to work together to fix the reasons why these injuries happen.

Methodology

The study used population-based mortality data collected by a demographic surveillance system on all resident and non-resident members of 11,000 households from 2000 to 2007.

Potential Biases

The study may be biased towards urban areas due to the nature of the demographic surveillance system.

Limitations

The study's findings may be limited by the accuracy of verbal autopsy data and the potential for underreporting of deaths.

Participant Demographics

The study included individuals from a rural population in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, with a focus on adults aged 15 years and older.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Confidence Interval

(134.0, 151.4)

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02730.x

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication