Decision Making Preferences in Medical Encounters
Author Information
Author(s): Meike Müller-Engelmann, Tanja Krones, Heidi Keller, Norbert Donner-Banzhoff
Primary Institution: University of Marburg, Germany
Hypothesis
The factorial survey is a feasible method to analyze the variables underlying the decision-making process in medical encounters.
Conclusion
The study will reveal how different clinical situations affect patients' and physicians' preferences for shared decision making.
Supporting Evidence
- The factorial survey method allows for systematic investigation of decision-making preferences.
- Shared decision making is increasingly preferred by patients and physicians.
- The study aims to identify situational factors that influence decision-making preferences.
Takeaway
This study is like asking people how they want to make decisions with their doctors in different situations, to help everyone feel more involved.
Methodology
A factorial survey design will be used to combine various situational factors and assess preferences among 300 participants including general practitioners, patients, and self-help group members.
Limitations
The study may not capture all possible situational factors affecting decision making in medical encounters.
Participant Demographics
Participants include 100 general practitioners, 100 patients, and 100 members of self-help groups, balanced for age, gender, and educational levels.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website