Functional constraint and small insertions and deletions in the ENCODE regions of the human genome
2007

Study of Small Insertions and Deletions in Human Genome

Sample size: 4486 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Clark Taane G, Andrew Toby, Cooper Gregory M, Margulies Elliott H, Mullikin James C, Balding David J

Primary Institution: Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College

Hypothesis

Do the 14 manually selected regions have lower insertion and deletion rates compared with the 30 randomly selected regions?

Conclusion

Indel rates are greatly reduced in transcribed and evolutionarily constrained DNA.

Supporting Evidence

  • Indel rates are reduced approximately 20-fold in exonic regions.
  • Indel rates are smaller than single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rates by a factor of approximately 2.
  • Indels are more common in non-coding regions compared to coding regions.

Takeaway

This study looks at tiny changes in our DNA called indels and finds that they happen less often in important parts of our genes.

Methodology

The study analyzed small insertion and deletion data from the ENCODE regions of the human genome.

Potential Biases

Potential ascertainment bias against AR sequence with common indels.

Limitations

The study relies on the completeness and accuracy of genomic annotation data.

Participant Demographics

Data derived from a pool of cell lines from eight unrelated adult African Americans.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.11

Confidence Interval

99% CI 13.4 to 16.7

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/gb-2007-8-9-r180

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication