Study of Small Insertions and Deletions in Human Genome
Author Information
Author(s): Clark Taane G, Andrew Toby, Cooper Gregory M, Margulies Elliott H, Mullikin James C, Balding David J
Primary Institution: Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College
Hypothesis
Do the 14 manually selected regions have lower insertion and deletion rates compared with the 30 randomly selected regions?
Conclusion
Indel rates are greatly reduced in transcribed and evolutionarily constrained DNA.
Supporting Evidence
- Indel rates are reduced approximately 20-fold in exonic regions.
- Indel rates are smaller than single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rates by a factor of approximately 2.
- Indels are more common in non-coding regions compared to coding regions.
Takeaway
This study looks at tiny changes in our DNA called indels and finds that they happen less often in important parts of our genes.
Methodology
The study analyzed small insertion and deletion data from the ENCODE regions of the human genome.
Potential Biases
Potential ascertainment bias against AR sequence with common indels.
Limitations
The study relies on the completeness and accuracy of genomic annotation data.
Participant Demographics
Data derived from a pool of cell lines from eight unrelated adult African Americans.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.11
Confidence Interval
99% CI 13.4 to 16.7
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website