Are we publishing 'the right stuff'?
2006

Are We Publishing 'The Right Stuff'?

Editorial

Author Information

Author(s): The PLoS Medicine Editors

Primary Institution: Public Library of Science

Hypothesis

Are we publishing key research studies addressing the major causes of death and disease?

Conclusion

The findings suggest that while we are addressing some key health issues, more research is needed on cardiovascular disease, diabetes, mental health, and other significant health concerns.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study confirms that the burden of morbidity and mortality due to HIV/AIDS will be higher than previously estimated.
  • The leading causes of burden of disease in 2030 are projected to be HIV/AIDS, unipolar depressive disorders, and ischemic heart disease.
  • Only 10% of health research funding is directed towards issues affecting the poorest 90% of the population.

Takeaway

This article talks about whether medical journals are publishing the right research to help with the biggest health problems in the world.

Methodology

The methodology used is similar to that of the earlier Global Burden of Disease study.

Potential Biases

There is a risk that the greatest health needs may not receive adequate research attention.

Limitations

The study does not account for unknown factors like international conflict that could affect future projections.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pmed.0030512

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication