Testing for Coccidioidomycosis among Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia
2008

Testing for Coccidioidomycosis among Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Sample size: 60 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Chang Douglas C., Anderson Shoana, Wannemuehler Kathleen, Engelthaler David M., Erhart Laura, Sunenshine Rebecca H., Burwell Lauren A., Park Benjamin J.

Primary Institution: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Hypothesis

What is the proportion of community-acquired pneumonia patients tested for Coccidioides spp. and what are the predictors of testing?

Conclusion

Testing for Coccidioides spp. among ambulatory patients with community-acquired pneumonia is infrequent in metropolitan Phoenix, leading to underdiagnosis of coccidioidomycosis.

Supporting Evidence

  • Only 2% of patients in system A were tested for Coccidioides spp. compared to 13% in system B.
  • 15% of tested patients had positive results for coccidioidomycosis.
  • Testing predictors included age over 18, rash, chest pain, and symptoms lasting more than 14 days.

Takeaway

Doctors should test patients with pneumonia for a disease called coccidioidomycosis, especially in areas where it's common, because many cases are missed.

Methodology

The study involved retrospective cohort studies and a case-control study to evaluate testing practices and predictors among patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to differences in testing practices between healthcare systems and lack of socioeconomic data.

Limitations

The study's definition of pneumonia included patients without a chest radiograph, which may not reflect true cases, and the findings may not be generalizable to other areas.

Participant Demographics

In system A, 19% white, 6% black, 69% Hispanic; system B had mostly privately insured patients.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Confidence Interval

95% CI 3%–20%

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3201/eid1407.070832

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication