Assessing Athletes' Implicit Attitudes Towards Doping
Author Information
Author(s): Petróczi Andrea, Aidman Eugene V, Nepusz Tamás
Primary Institution: Kingston University
Hypothesis
Can the Implicit Associations Test (IAT) effectively measure implicit attitudes towards doping in athletes?
Conclusion
The study suggests that the PE-IAT method can capture undeclared attitudes towards doping and predict behavior, supporting targeted anti-doping interventions.
Supporting Evidence
- Longer response times indicated a less favorable evaluation of doping substances.
- The PE-IAT measure did not correlate significantly with declared doping attitudes.
- Participants who would consider using doping showed less implicit negativity towards banned substances.
- Competitive sport participants scored significantly lower on the Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale.
Takeaway
This study used a special test to see how athletes really feel about doping, even if they don't say it out loud, and found that their hidden feelings can affect their choices.
Methodology
The study combined the Implicit Associations Test (IAT) with self-report measures to assess athletes' attitudes towards doping.
Potential Biases
Self-report measures may be influenced by social desirability, leading to potential bias in the results.
Limitations
The study's sample was predominantly male and consisted of undergraduate students, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.
Participant Demographics
The sample was predominantly male (83.3%) with a mean age of 21.59 years, and over half were involved in organized competitive sports.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p = .047
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website