Comparing Health Systems: Denmark vs. Kaiser Permanente
Author Information
Author(s): Frølich Anne, Schiøtz Michaela L, Strandberg-Larsen Martin, Hsu John, Krasnik Allan, Diderichsen Finn, Bellows Jim, Søgaard Jes, White Karen
Primary Institution: Copenhagen Hospital Corporation
Hypothesis
How do health care system inputs and performance compare between Denmark and Kaiser Permanente?
Conclusion
Kaiser Permanente has a population with more chronic conditions and higher operating costs, but also higher quality measures compared to the Danish Health Care System.
Supporting Evidence
- KP patients had higher rates of chronic conditions like diabetes and hypertension compared to DHS patients.
- KP had lower hospitalization rates and shorter lengths of stay than the DHS.
- Screening rates for chronic conditions were significantly higher in KP than in the DHS.
Takeaway
This study looked at how two health care systems work and found that one has more sick people but also does a better job at helping them.
Methodology
Retrospective analysis of secondary data from the Danish Health Care System and Kaiser Permanente.
Potential Biases
Potential biases due to differences in population demographics and health care delivery models.
Limitations
The study's findings may be limited by differences in population characteristics and the availability of detailed data.
Participant Demographics
The KP population is generally younger, better educated, and wealthier compared to the DHS population.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website