Informational Roles and Psychological Health in Cancer Teams
Author Information
Author(s): Catt S, Fallowfield L, Jenkins V, Langridge C, Cox A
Primary Institution: Cancer Research UK, Psychosocial Oncology Group, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex
Hypothesis
What are the informational roles and psychological health of members of oncology multidisciplinary teams in the UK?
Conclusion
The study found that while some roles in cancer teams are well recognized, others are ambiguous, and there are significant issues with communication and psychological well-being among team members.
Supporting Evidence
- Team members recognized the roles of surgeons and oncologists in providing information to patients.
- Clinical nurse specialists provided the broadest information coverage for patients.
- Probable psychiatric morbidity in teams ranged from 5 to 27%.
- High levels of emotional exhaustion were particularly apparent in team leaders and nurses.
Takeaway
This study looked at how cancer care teams share information with patients and found that some team members are not clear about their roles, which can lead to stress and burnout.
Methodology
Team members completed an Informational Roles Questionnaire and two psychological health measures, the General Health Questionnaire and Maslach Burnout Inventory.
Potential Biases
Potential discrepancies in role understanding may lead to burnout and contradictory information being given to patients.
Limitations
The study's results are purely descriptive and statistical testing was not considered appropriate due to small numbers and multiple comparisons.
Participant Demographics
Members from 10 multidisciplinary cancer teams in the UK, including various specialties.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website