Survey of Organizations Supporting Research Evidence in Health Policy
Author Information
Author(s): John N. Lavis, Elizabeth J. Paulsen, Andrew D. Oxman, Ray Moynihan
Primary Institution: McMaster University
Hypothesis
How do organizations that support the use of research evidence in health policy operate and what are their characteristics?
Conclusion
The survey provides a comprehensive overview of organizations that support evidence-informed health policy, highlighting their strengths, weaknesses, and operational characteristics.
Supporting Evidence
- 86% of organizations surveyed completed the questionnaire.
- More than half of organizations reported that examples from other countries were helpful in establishing their organization.
- Most organizations have five or fewer full-time equivalent staff.
Takeaway
This study looked at different organizations that help make health policies better by using research. It found that many of these organizations work together and learn from each other.
Methodology
A questionnaire was sent to 176 organizations, with follow-ups to non-responders, resulting in 152 completed responses.
Potential Biases
There may be a risk of social desirability bias in responses.
Limitations
The survey had a high proportion of organizations from high-income countries, and responses may have been influenced by social desirability bias.
Participant Demographics
Organizations included CPG-producing organizations, HTA agencies, and GSUs from various income levels and regions.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website