Lung cancer and passive smoking (continued)
1991
Lung Cancer and Passive Smoking
Editorial
Author Information
Author(s): Peter Lee
Hypothesis
The increase in lung cancer risk observed in non-smokers due to passive smoking is overestimated.
Conclusion
The author argues that the risk of lung cancer from passive smoking is not as significant as reported.
Supporting Evidence
- The author argues that cotinine levels may overestimate exposure to smoke.
- The relative risk of lung cancer in male smokers is lower than reported.
- Comparisons of passive and active smoking risks should come from the same study.
Takeaway
Some people think that being around smokers can cause lung cancer, but the author believes that the risk is not as big as some studies suggest.
Potential Biases
There may be misclassification of active smoking status affecting the results.
Limitations
The author points out potential biases in measuring exposure to tobacco smoke.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website