Microsatellites versus single-nucleotide polymorphisms in linkage analysis for quantitative and qualitative measures
2005

Comparing SNPs and Microsatellites in Linkage Analysis

Sample size: 1214 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Gerald Dunn, Anthony L Hinrichs, Sarah Bertelsen, Carol H Jin, John S Kauwe, Brian K Suarez, Laura J Bierut

Primary Institution: Washington University School of Medicine

Hypothesis

Are SNPs more effective than microsatellites for linkage analysis of phenotypes?

Conclusion

SNPs provide stronger linkage results than microsatellites for both neurophysiology and alcohol dependence phenotypes.

Supporting Evidence

  • SNPs produced higher LOD scores than microsatellites for both phenotypes.
  • The analysis used two SNP maps on Illumina and Affymetrix platforms.
  • LOD scores for neurophysiology and alcohol dependence were compared across different marker types.
  • Thinning SNP maps in regions of high linkage disequilibrium can yield more accurate results.

Takeaway

This study found that using SNPs instead of microsatellites can help scientists find genetic links to traits better and faster.

Methodology

The study analyzed linkage results using SNP and microsatellite maps for two phenotypes in a Caucasian subpopulation.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to differences in allele frequencies between populations.

Limitations

The study was limited to a specific population and may not generalize to other groups.

Participant Demographics

Caucasian subpopulation of 1,214 individuals in 112 pedigrees.

Statistical Information

P-Value

2 × 10^-14

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S122

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication