Measuring Conditions for Successful Quality Improvement Collaboratives
Author Information
Author(s): Dückers Michel LA, Wagner Cordula, Groenewegen Peter P
Primary Institution: NIVEL – Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research
Hypothesis
The study aims to develop an instrument to measure team organization and support in quality improvement collaboratives.
Conclusion
The instrument shows good psychometric properties and is a promising tool for assessing team organization and support during QIC implementation.
Supporting Evidence
- The instrument was developed based on expert reviews and tested for reliability and validity.
- Three components were identified that explain 65% of the variability in the data.
- Scale reliability ranged from 0.77 to 0.91, indicating good internal consistency.
Takeaway
This study created a tool to help teams in hospitals work better together and get the support they need to improve patient care.
Methodology
The study involved content development and assessment followed by field testing with a sample of 165 project leaders using a 15-item instrument.
Limitations
The study could not assess Test-Retest Reliability and the sample included diverse respondents which may affect the generalizability of the results.
Participant Demographics
48% medical professionals, 29% managers, 23% advisors; 60% female, mean age 43 years.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website