Drug-Resistant Campylobacter in Poultry
Author Information
Author(s): Angela Spivey
Primary Institution: Johns Hopkins University
Hypothesis
Does the ban on fluoroquinolones in poultry farms effectively reduce antibiotic-resistant Campylobacter in chicken sold to consumers?
Conclusion
The ban on fluoroquinolones may not be sufficient to reduce the prevalence of drug-resistant Campylobacter in poultry.
Supporting Evidence
- The bacteria from conventional chicken were more likely to be fluoroquinolone-resistant than those from antibiotic-free products.
- The proportion of antibiotic-resistant bacteria on conventionally produced chicken showed no significant change between 2004 and 2006.
- Once antibiotic-resistant bacteria develop, they may persist in the food supply long after antibiotic use stops.
Takeaway
Some chickens still have germs that don't get killed by certain antibiotics, even after farmers stopped using those antibiotics.
Methodology
Researchers bought chicken from five producers over 20 weeks in 2004 and 15 weeks in 2006, testing for Campylobacter and antibiotic resistance.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to lack of reporting requirements for antibiotic use in poultry.
Limitations
The study could not verify claims of antibiotic prohibition by poultry producers.
Statistical Information
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website