Usefulness and applicability of the revised dengue case classification by disease: multi-centre study in 18 countries
2011

Revised Dengue Case Classification Study

Sample size: 3248 publication Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Barniol Judit, Gaczkowski Roger, Barbato Eliana Vega, da Cunha Rivaldo V, Salgado Doris, Martínez Eric, Segarra Carmita Soria, Pleites Sandoval Ernesto B, Mishra Ajay, Laksono Ida Safitri, Lum Lucy CS, Martínez José G, Núñez Andrea, Balsameda Angel, Allende Ivan, Ramírez Gladys, Dimaano Efren, Thomacheck Kay, Akbar Naeema A, Ooi Eng E, Villegas Elci, Hien Tran T, Farrar Jeremy, Horstick Olaf, Kroeger Axel, Jaenisch Thomas

Primary Institution: University Hospital Heidelberg

Hypothesis

The study aims to compare the applicability of the revised dengue classification system with the traditional DF/DHF/DSS classification.

Conclusion

The revised dengue classification has a high potential for facilitating dengue case management and surveillance.

Supporting Evidence

  • The revised classification captured more cases than the DF/DHF/DSS classification.
  • Only 1.6% of patients could not be classified using the revised system compared to 13.7% with the old system.
  • High acceptance and perceived user-friendliness of the revised system were reported by health staff.
  • The study included a total of 3248 medical chart reviews from 18 countries.
  • Training and dissemination of the revised classification were highlighted as necessary for effective implementation.

Takeaway

This study looked at how well a new way to classify dengue cases works compared to the old method, and found that the new way is much better.

Methodology

The study used a mix of quantitative and qualitative methods, including medical chart reviews, staff interviews, and focus group discussions across 18 countries.

Potential Biases

Potential bias may arise from the knowledge of outcomes influencing reviewers' assessments.

Limitations

The study highlighted the need for training and dissemination of the revised classification and further research on warning signs.

Participant Demographics

Participants included healthcare staff from various levels of care across 18 countries in Latin America and Asia.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2334-11-106

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication