Investigating Fairness in NAS Committees
Author Information
Author(s): Charles W. Schmidt
Primary Institution: Center for Science in the Public Interest
Hypothesis
Are NAS committees fair and balanced in their views?
Conclusion
The investigation found that one in five NAS committee members had ties to industries that could influence study outcomes, raising questions about the objectivity of these committees.
Supporting Evidence
- One in five NAS committee members had direct ties to industries with a stake in study outcomes.
- At least 56 experts had conflicts of interest as defined by CSPI.
- 66 experts had a history of pro-industry positions in research or legal testimony.
Takeaway
A group looked at experts on committees and found that some had connections to companies that might affect their decisions, which could make the committees less fair.
Methodology
The CSPI reviewed 21 NAS committees over two and a half years.
Potential Biases
The definition of conflict of interest used by CSPI may exclude qualified experts.
Limitations
The investigation could not find evidence that industry ties influenced NAS conclusions.
Participant Demographics
The study reviewed 320 experts, including those with industry ties and those aligned with nonprofit organizations.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website