Reliability and Validity of the Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale
Author Information
Author(s): Lehnig Franziska, Linde Katja, Schmidt Viktoria, Nagl Michaela, Martini Julia, Stepan Holger, Kersting Anette
Primary Institution: Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
Hypothesis
The study aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of both the original and the brief German version of the Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale (MAAS).
Conclusion
The brief German version of the MAAS is a reliable and valid measurement tool for maternal-fetal attachment in clinical practice.
Supporting Evidence
- The brief German MAAS showed better psychometric properties than the original version.
- Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were acceptable to good for both MAAS versions.
- Correlations with maternal mental health variables supported the construct validity of the brief German MAAS.
Takeaway
This study looked at how well a questionnaire measures the bond between mothers and their unborn babies, finding that a shorter version of the questionnaire works just as well.
Methodology
Data from 184 pregnant women were collected through questionnaires measuring maternal mental health, self-esteem, and social support, and analyzed for the MAAS.
Potential Biases
Potential selection bias due to recruitment from a university hospital and the requirement of fluent German language skills.
Limitations
The sample may not be representative of the general population due to selection bias, and the study's cross-sectional design limits causal interpretations.
Participant Demographics
Participants were primarily German women aged 21 to 45, mostly in partnerships, with a high level of education and income.
Statistical Information
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website