Understanding multinational companies in public health systems, using a competitive advantage framework
2011

Understanding Multinational Companies in Public Health Systems

Sample size: 5 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Jane Lethbridge

Primary Institution: University of Greenwich, UK

Hypothesis

Global private interests enter national health policy settings through the use of expertise and additional skills for national health systems dealing with growing demographic pressures and demands for health care.

Conclusion

The study shows that analyzing the strategic objectives of health care companies can help explain their actions and motives towards public health care systems.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study developed five case studies of multinational health care companies involved in public health care systems.
  • Porter's Five Forces framework was used to analyze company strategies.
  • Health service commissioners need to understand the dynamic process of multinational companies in public health care.

Takeaway

This study looks at how big health companies are getting involved in public health care and what strategies they use to do that.

Methodology

The study used a case study approach with qualitative methods, including interviews and document analysis.

Limitations

The study is limited to five case studies and may not represent all multinational health care companies.

Participant Demographics

The companies studied include Capio, ISS Healthcare, Fresenius, Parkway Holdings, and BUPA, representing various national origins.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1744-8603-7-19

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication