Psychiatrists and Psychologists in Interrogations: Ethical Concerns
Author Information
Author(s): Abraham L. Halpern, John H. Halpern, Sean B. Doherty
Hypothesis
Do psychologists and psychiatrists participate in coercive interrogations of detainees?
Conclusion
Psychiatrists and psychologists involved in coercive interrogations violate ethical standards and the Geneva Conventions.
Supporting Evidence
- Psychiatrists and psychologists have been found to participate in coercive interrogations.
- The American Psychiatric Association and the American Psychological Association have issued statements against such participation.
- Participation in interrogations undermines the trust between patients and physicians.
- Many nations consider certain interrogation techniques to be torture.
- Education on ethics is crucial for preventing future participation in unethical practices.
Takeaway
Some doctors are helping to question prisoners in ways that many people think are wrong and against the rules. It's important for doctors to remember to always help people, not hurt them.
Potential Biases
Potential bias from the authors' strong ethical stance against participation in interrogations.
Limitations
The commentary does not provide empirical data or a systematic review of the participation of psychologists and psychiatrists in interrogations.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website