Clinical Success of Pulpotomies Using Intermediate Restorations and Preformed Metal Crowns in the Context of a Developing Country: A Retrospective Questionnaire-Based Investigation
2024

Success of Pulp Treatments in Children's Teeth

Sample size: 199 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Montero-Copoya Ana Luisa, Robles-Bermeo Norma Leticia, Lucas-Rincón Salvador Eduardo, Márquez-Corona María de Lourdes, Guadarrama-Reyes Saraí Carmina, Lovera-Rojas Nayeli, Casanova-Rosado Juan Fernando, Villalobos-Rodelo Juan José, Escoffié-Ramírez Mauricio, Medina-Solís Carlo Eduardo, Di Palo Maria Pia, Di Spirito Federica

Primary Institution: Autonomous University of the State of Mexico

Hypothesis

What is the clinical success rate of pulpotomies using Intermediate Restorative Material and preformed metal crowns in children?

Conclusion

The clinical success rate of primary teeth treated with pulpotomy, Intermediate Restorative Material, and preformed metal crowns was high, close to 100%.

Supporting Evidence

  • The clinical success rate was 98.2% based on symptom reports from parents.
  • 414 teeth were treated with pulpotomy, IRM, and PMCs during the study.
  • Follow-ups ranged from 6 to 69 months, with an average of 42.4 months.
  • Most participants were girls, and the average age was 5.28 years.
  • Three treatments failed due to infectious processes, while 53 teeth had normal exfoliation.

Takeaway

This study found that a treatment for children's teeth can work really well, almost all the time, helping kids avoid pain and keep their teeth healthy.

Methodology

A cross-sectional ambispective study reviewing medical records and conducting telephone interviews with parents/caregivers.

Potential Biases

Selection bias may have occurred due to using children from a single public university setting.

Limitations

Data collection relied on parental recall, which may introduce bias, and the study lacked a control group.

Participant Demographics

Most participants were girls (54.3%), with an average age of 5.28 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.0001

Confidence Interval

95%

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/clinpract14060203

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication