Re-annotation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genome
Author Information
Author(s): V. Wood, K. M. Rutherford, A Ivens, M-A Rajandream, B. Barrell
Primary Institution: The Sanger Centre, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus
Hypothesis
S. cerevisiae would benefit from a consistent re-annotation to resolve discrepancies in gene and orphan numbers.
Conclusion
The study identified three new genes and proposed a new upper limit of 5570 for the number of genes in S. cerevisiae.
Supporting Evidence
- Three new genes were identified in the re-annotation process.
- 46 alterations to gene coordinates were proposed.
- 370 ORFs were defined as spurious and should be disregarded.
- 193 genes were classified as very hypothetical based on specific criteria.
Takeaway
Scientists looked at the genes in yeast and found some new ones while also correcting mistakes in the old list of genes.
Methodology
The analysis involved downloading DNA sequences, converting ORF coordinates, and using various standard analysis tools to interpret the sequence data.
Limitations
The study may still overestimate the number of genes due to the conservative criteria used for determining very hypothetical proteins.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website