Public Involvement in Quality Indicator Prioritization
Author Information
Author(s): Boivin Antoine, Lehoux Pascale, Lacombe Réal, Lacasse Anaïs, Burgers Jako, Grol Richard
Primary Institution: Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
Hypothesis
Public involvement will result in quality-indicator choices that better agree with public priorities.
Conclusion
The study demonstrates the feasibility of involving the public in the prioritization of quality indicators for chronic disease management.
Supporting Evidence
- This is the first trial of public involvement in quality-indicator prioritisation.
- 801 quality indicators were identified and a final set of 37 was agreed upon.
- Pilot testing involved 27 participants and demonstrated the feasibility of the intervention.
Takeaway
This study is about asking regular people what they think is important for healthcare, so doctors can make better choices that match what patients want.
Methodology
A cluster randomised controlled trial comparing quality-indicator prioritisation with and without public involvement.
Potential Biases
Potential for bias due to the limited representation of public perspectives in decision-making processes.
Limitations
The study has a small effective sample size due to the cluster nature of the trial and restrictions on participant recruitment.
Participant Demographics
Participants include public representatives, clinicians, and managers from six local health authorities in Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Canada.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.05
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website