Impact of Early Growth on Postprandial Responses in Later Life
2011

Impact of Early Growth on Postprandial Responses in Later Life

Sample size: 24 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Perälä Mia-Maria, Valsta Liisa M., Kajantie Eero, Leiviskä Jaana, Eriksson Johan G.

Primary Institution: The National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland

Hypothesis

The study aims to examine the impact of growth during infancy on postprandial responses to different meal types.

Conclusion

Small birth size and slow early growth predict higher postprandial triglyceride and insulin responses, which may increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases later in life.

Supporting Evidence

  • Subjects with slow growth during infancy had higher postprandial triglyceride responses after both meal types.
  • Insulin responses were significantly higher for the slow growth group after the fast-food meal.
  • Fasting glucose, insulin, and lipid concentrations did not differ significantly between the groups.

Takeaway

If babies are small at birth and grow slowly in their first year, they might have higher levels of certain fats and insulin in their blood after eating, which can be bad for their heart when they grow up.

Methodology

The study involved 24 overweight participants aged 65-75, divided into two groups based on early growth patterns, who consumed two different meals while their blood responses were measured.

Potential Biases

The study may not be generalizable to normal weight individuals as all participants were overweight.

Limitations

The study had a small sample size and included participants with both normal and impaired glucose tolerance, which may affect the results.

Participant Demographics

24 overweight participants aged 65-75, with 12 having slow growth during infancy and 12 with normal growth.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.036 for insulin response after FF-meal; 0.047 for triglycerides after FF-meal

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0024070

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication