The Health‐Related Quality of Life Impact of the COVID‐19 Pandemic on People Living with Multiple Sclerosis and the General Population: A Comparative Study Utilizing the EQ‐5D‐5L with Psychosocial Bolt‐Ons
2024

Impact of COVID-19 on Quality of Life in People with Multiple Sclerosis

Sample size: 2656 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Glen J. Henson, Ingrid van der Mei, Bruce V. Taylor, Suzi B. Claflin, Andrew J. Palmer, Gang Chen, Julie A. Campbell

Primary Institution: Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania

Hypothesis

Does the COVID-19 pandemic impact the health-related quality of life of people living with multiple sclerosis compared to the general population?

Conclusion

People with multiple sclerosis experienced more COVID-19-related adversity than the general population, but the overall impact on health-related quality of life was similar.

Supporting Evidence

  • PwMS were 1.496 times more likely to report COVID-19-related adversity compared to the general population.
  • COVID-19-related adversity was associated with a 0.129-point reduction in health state utility for all participants.
  • Mean health state utility for PwMS reporting adversity was 0.512, compared to 0.671 for those not reporting adversity.

Takeaway

This study shows that people with multiple sclerosis had a harder time during the COVID-19 pandemic, but their overall health was affected just like everyone else's.

Methodology

Cross-sectional data were collected from two studies, measuring health-related quality of life using the EQ-5D-5L-Psychosocial and assessing COVID-19-related adversity through surveys.

Potential Biases

Potential selection bias due to the voluntary nature of participation in the studies.

Limitations

Different measures were used to assess COVID-19-related adversity in the two samples, which may affect comparability.

Participant Demographics

Mean age of participants was 52.4 years for the general population and 58.4 years for PwMS, with a higher proportion of females in the PwMS group (80.2%).

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Confidence Interval

[1.153, 1.774]

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1002/brb3.70210

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication