Effects on quality of life, anti-cancer responses, breast conserving surgery and survival with neoadjuvant docetaxel: a randomised study of sequential weekly versus three-weekly docetaxel following neoadjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in women with primary breast cancer
2011

Weekly vs. Three-Weekly Docetaxel for Breast Cancer

Sample size: 89 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Walker Leslie G, Eremin Jennifer M, Aloysius Mark M, Vassanasiri Wichai, Walker Mary B, El-Sheemy Mohamed, Cowley Ged, Beer Jeanette, Samphao Srila, Wiseman Janice, Jibril Jibril A, Valerio David, Clarke David J, Kamal Mujahid, Thorpe Gerald W, Baria Karin, Eremin Oleg

Primary Institution: Oncology Health Centres and the Institute of Rehabilitation, University of Hull

Hypothesis

Does weekly docetaxel improve quality of life compared to three-weekly docetaxel in women undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer?

Conclusion

Weekly docetaxel is well-tolerated and has less distressing side effects, without compromising therapeutic responses, breast conserving surgery, or survival outcomes.

Supporting Evidence

  • Patients receiving weekly docetaxel reported less constipation, nail problems, neuropathy, tiredness, distress, depressed mood, and unhappiness.
  • There were no significant differences in overall clinical response rates between the two treatment groups.
  • Both treatment regimens resulted in similar disease-free survival and overall survival rates.

Takeaway

This study looked at two ways to give a cancer drug to women with breast cancer. The weekly way was easier on the patients, but both ways worked about the same.

Methodology

Eighty-nine patients were randomized to receive either twelve cycles of weekly docetaxel or four cycles of three-weekly docetaxel after four cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide.

Potential Biases

Potential biases in patient selection and self-reported quality of life measures.

Limitations

The study had a small sample size and may not be generalizable to all breast cancer patients.

Participant Demographics

Women aged 18-70 with large or locally advanced breast cancer.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.86

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2407-11-179

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication