Laryngeal Mask Airway Training Study
Author Information
Author(s): Laiou Elpiniki, Clutton-Brock Thomas H, Lilford Richard J, Taylor Celia A
Primary Institution: University of Birmingham
Hypothesis
An additional session of formal simulation training would promote speed of learning and result in a higher level of skill than brief simulation training when LMA placement is first undertaken in clinical practice.
Conclusion
The value of extended mannequin simulation training in the case of LMA placement is limited.
Supporting Evidence
- Participants who received additional mannequin training had similar success rates in LMA placement as those who received only brief training.
- The agreement between participants and instructors regarding LMA placement success was poor to fair.
- Participants reported that mannequins were poor at mimicking reality.
Takeaway
This study looked at whether more practice with mannequins helps medical students place a breathing device better. It found that extra practice didn't really help.
Methodology
Medical students were randomly assigned to receive either brief mannequin training or additional intensive mannequin training, and their performance was assessed during clinical practice.
Potential Biases
The instructors assessing the students were not specifically trained for this study, which may introduce variability in the assessment.
Limitations
The study had a high dropout rate and used only one type of laryngeal mask airway, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.
Participant Demographics
{"total_participants":126,"completed_study":78,"sex_distribution":{"male":32,"female":68},"age_mean":22.6}
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.37
Statistical Significance
p=0.37
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website