Comparing Nasal Wash and Swab for Detecting Respiratory Pathogens
Author Information
Author(s): Gritzfeld Jenna F, Roberts Paul, Roche Lorna, El Batrawy Sherouk, Gordon Stephen B
Primary Institution: Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
Hypothesis
Is nasal washing more effective than nasopharyngeal swabbing in detecting respiratory pathogens in healthy adults?
Conclusion
Nasal washing is more comfortable and more likely to detect pathogens than nasopharyngeal swabbing.
Supporting Evidence
- Nasal washing was preferred by 91% of volunteers over swabbing.
- Nasal washing detected pathogens significantly more often than nasopharyngeal swabbing.
- Detection of N. meningitidis was better by real-time PCR on nasal washes than on swabs.
Takeaway
Nasal washing is like using a gentle rinse instead of a stick to check for germs in your nose, and it works better and feels nicer.
Methodology
Healthy adults were sampled using both nasopharyngeal swabs and nasal washes, and the detection of pathogens was compared using culture and PCR methods.
Limitations
The small sample size and low carriage rate of pathogens limit the generalizability of the findings.
Participant Demographics
Healthy adults aged 18-60.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.00001
Statistical Significance
p<0.00001
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website