Comparison of three different prehospital wrapping methods for preventing hypothermia - a crossover study in humans
2011

Comparing Methods to Prevent Hypothermia

Sample size: 8 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Thomassen Øyvind, Færevik Hilde, Østerås Øyvind, Sunde Geir Arne, Zakariassen Erik, Sandsund Mariann, Heltne Jon Kenneth, Brattebø Guttorm

Primary Institution: Haukeland University Hospital

Hypothesis

A combination of a vapour-tight layer and a dry insulating layer (Hibler's method) is the most efficient in preventing hypothermia when subjects are wearing wet clothing.

Conclusion

Hibler's method is the most effective way to prevent heat loss in wet patients at risk of hypothermia.

Supporting Evidence

  • Hibler's method resulted in significantly higher skin temperatures compared to bubble wrap and ambulance blankets.
  • Subjects reported more discomfort and shivering when wrapped in bubble wrap.
  • The study was conducted under controlled laboratory conditions to mimic prehospital environments.

Takeaway

This study tested different ways to keep people warm when they're wet and cold. It found that one special method works best to keep them warm.

Methodology

Eight volunteers were wrapped in three different insulation methods and their temperatures and comfort levels were measured in a cold environment.

Potential Biases

Participants were not blinded, which could influence subjective comfort ratings.

Limitations

The study involved only healthy male volunteers, which may not represent all patient demographics.

Participant Demographics

Eight healthy, non-smoking male volunteers, average age 26.3 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1757-7241-19-41

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication