Evaluation of Emotional Distress in Oncology Palliative Patients: Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and Palliative Outcome Scale (POS)—A Portuguese Cross-Sectional Study
2024

Emotional Distress in Cancer Patients Receiving Palliative Care

Sample size: 60 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Gonçalves Florbela, Gaudêncio Margarida, Paiva Ivo, Rego Francisca, Nunes Rui

Primary Institution: Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto

Hypothesis

The study aims to analyze the psychometric properties of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and the Palliative Outcome Scale (POS) among hospitalized cancer patients receiving palliative care.

Conclusion

The ESAS and POS are effective tools for evaluating emotional distress in palliative care patients.

Supporting Evidence

  • Patients with advanced cancer often experience high levels of emotional suffering.
  • The study confirmed that self-reported anxiety and depression are correlated with emotional questions.
  • Anxiety related to disease was strongly correlated with increased self-reported anxiety.
  • Patients who shared their feelings less frequently were less likely to find meaning in life.

Takeaway

This study shows that cancer patients in palliative care often feel very sad and anxious, and using simple tools can help doctors understand their feelings better.

Methodology

A cross-sectional, descriptive, and correlational study was conducted using psychological screening instruments (ESAS and POS) among hospitalized cancer patients.

Potential Biases

The study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may have influenced patient responses due to social isolation.

Limitations

The sample size is small and limited to a single hospital, which may affect the generalizability of the findings.

Participant Demographics

The majority of participants were male (61.7%) with a median age of 72 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.01

Statistical Significance

p<0.01

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/cancers16244232

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication