Evaluating the 3-month post-intervention impact of a supportive text message program on mental health outcomes during the 2023 wildfires in Alberta and Nova Scotia, Canada
2024

Impact of Supportive Text Messages on Mental Health After Wildfires

Sample size: 150 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Obuobi-Donkor Gloria, Shalaby Reham, Agyapong Belinda, Dias Raquel da Luz, Eboreime Ejemai, Wozney Lori, Agyapong Vincent Israel Opoku

Primary Institution: Dalhousie University

Hypothesis

Participants who subscribe to the program will have at least 20% reduced mean scores on PHQ-9, GAD-7, and PCL-C and a 20% increase in the mean scores on the BRS and WHO-5 at 3 months compared with their enrolment scores.

Conclusion

The supportive text intervention program effectively aids individuals who have endured natural disasters like wildfires, showing significant improvements in mental health outcomes.

Supporting Evidence

  • Participants showed a statistically significant change in mental health scores after receiving supportive text messages.
  • The prevalence of poor mental well-being significantly decreased from baseline to 3 months.
  • Text message interventions are scalable and can reach many individuals simultaneously.

Takeaway

Sending supportive text messages to people affected by wildfires can help them feel better and cope with their feelings over time.

Methodology

Participants subscribed to the Text4Hope services and completed online surveys at baseline and 3 months post-enrollment to measure mental health outcomes.

Potential Biases

Self-rated scales may introduce response bias and inaccuracies.

Limitations

The study had a limited number of participants completing both surveys, potential response bias due to self-reporting, and lacked a control group.

Participant Demographics

Majority were females (84.4%), aged 31-50 years (40.1%), and predominantly Caucasian (83.8%).

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3389/fpubh.2024.1452872

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication