Joining the dots: Conditional pass and programmatic assessment enhances recognition of problems with professionalism and factors hampering student progress
2011

Improving Student Assessment in Medical Education

Sample size: 701 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Tim J Wilkinson, Mike J Tweed, Tony G Egan, Anthony N Ali, Jan M McKenzie, MaryLeigh Moore, Joy R Rudland

Primary Institution: University of Otago

Hypothesis

A programmatic assessment system can enhance the recognition of professionalism issues and factors affecting student progress.

Conclusion

The new assessment system has improved the detection of students in difficulty and reduced the instances of 'failure to fail'.

Supporting Evidence

  • The new system identified 6.5% of students with concerns compared to only 1.1% under the previous system.
  • More students failed the year under the new system due to unmet conditions of a Conditional Pass.
  • Problems with professionalism were the biggest risk factor for failing a year.
  • The assessment system was implemented across three campuses over four years.
  • Regular progress meetings enhanced the reliability and validity of student assessments.
  • Conditional Passes required specific conditions to be met for students to progress.
  • Students with multiple identified problems were more likely to fail.
  • The study was approved by the University of Otago Human Ethics Committee.

Takeaway

This study shows that a new way of checking how students are doing helps teachers find students who need extra help, especially with being professional.

Methodology

The study evaluated a new assessment system over four years, analyzing student performance and concerns identified through Conditional Pass classifications.

Potential Biases

There is a risk of bias in how concerns are reported and interpreted by faculty.

Limitations

The study may not account for all factors affecting student performance and relies on the accuracy of reported concerns.

Participant Demographics

Medical students in years 4-6 of a 6-year program.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p < 0.0001

Confidence Interval

95% CI 7.7-46.2

Statistical Significance

p<0.01

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6920-11-29

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication