Continuous Admission to Primary School and Mental Health Problems
Author Information
Author(s): Reijneveld Sijmen A, Wiefferink Carin H, Brugman Emily, Verhulst Frank C, Verloove-Vanhorick S Pauline, Paulussen Theo GW
Primary Institution: University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen
Hypothesis
Does continuous admission to primary school reduce mental health problems among children compared to traditional yearly admission?
Conclusion
Continuous admission to primary school does not prevent mental health problems among young children, but may do so at older ages.
Supporting Evidence
- At ages 5–6, higher rates of mental health problems were found in younger children.
- The study included a large sample size of 12,221 children.
- Continuous admission may have favorable effects on mental health at older ages.
Takeaway
This study looked at whether letting kids start school anytime during the year helps them feel better mentally. It found that while it doesn't help younger kids, it might help older ones.
Methodology
The study assessed mental health problems using parent-reports and professional assessments among two Dutch national samples of children aged 5–15 years.
Potential Biases
The study used well-validated questionnaires and professional judgments, limiting the likelihood of information bias.
Limitations
The two datasets were collected for different purposes, which may affect the results.
Participant Demographics
Children aged 5–15 years from two national samples in the Netherlands.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.017
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website