Ethical Analysis of Proposed Mental Health Legislation in England and Wales
Author Information
Author(s): Peter Lepping
Primary Institution: North East Wales NHS Trust, Wrexham University of Wales Academic Unit
Hypothesis
The proposed changes to the Mental Health Act represent a shift from rights-focused principles to utilitarian principles.
Conclusion
The proposed changes to the Mental Health Act may lead to increased risks of patient rights being overridden in favor of public safety.
Supporting Evidence
- The government claims that community care has failed, but evidence suggests it has been successful.
- The proposed legislation may lead to increased stigmatisation of mental illness.
- Changes in the legislation may prioritize public safety over individual rights.
Takeaway
This study looks at new laws about mental health and how they might take away some rights from patients to keep the public safe.
Methodology
The paper provides a philosophical ethical analysis of the proposed changes to the Mental Health Act.
Potential Biases
There is a risk that the proposed changes may lead to wrongful detentions and a loss of trust in the mental health system.
Limitations
The analysis is based on the premises and consequences of the proposed legislation, which are not well-supported by evidence.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website