Lessons from Digital Radiology for Digital Pathology
Author Information
Author(s): Andrew J. Evans
Primary Institution: Department of Pathology, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
Hypothesis
Why is the adoption of digital imaging in pathology slower than in radiology?
Conclusion
Pathologists perceive digital imaging systems as inferior, which hinders their adoption despite improvements in technology.
Supporting Evidence
- Pathologists have a lower opinion of digital systems compared to radiologists.
- Concerns include differences in magnification, large file sizes, and longer review times.
- Improved digital systems are necessary for greater adoption in pathology.
Takeaway
Pathologists are slow to use digital images because they think they don't work as well as traditional glass slides, even though the technology is getting better.
Methodology
The authors conducted semi-structured interviews with radiologists and pathologists.
Potential Biases
Potential bias in the perception of digital systems due to reliance on traditional methods.
Limitations
The perception of inferior performance of digital systems by pathologists is a significant barrier to adoption.
Participant Demographics
Pathologists and radiologists from various institutions.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website